Author: Date: Subject:
Bob
2008-06-10 20:40:40
Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6
I have been researching the Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6 microphones for
use with acoustic instruments. So far the samples I have heard from both are
very good and as a general statement, to my ear, the C42 is slightly
brighter. They are priced close enough that I could purchase either one but
the CEMC6 has removable capsules making them a little more versatile. Has
anyone used both of these microphones and if so do you have any opinions?
Thanks.
Bob
Author: Date: Subject:
Soundhaspriority
2008-06-10 16:43:02
Re: Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6
"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:cFB3k.20505$C12.6340@pd7urf3no...
>I have been researching the Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6 microphones for
>use with acoustic instruments. So far the samples I have heard from both
>are very good and as a general statement, to my ear, the C42 is slightly
>brighter. They are priced close enough that I could purchase either one but
>the CEMC6 has removable capsules making them a little more versatile. Has
>anyone used both of these microphones and if so do you have any opinions?
>Thanks.
>
> Bob
I have not heard them, but from what I know about the construction of the
CEMC6, which is shared with a number of very inexpensive Chinese brands, the
Peluso must be far superior.
Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511
Author: Date: Subject:
Soundhaspriority
2008-06-10 17:06:56
CORRECTION!!!
"Soundhaspriority" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:epWdnfGAAsDLetPVnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:cFB3k.20505$C12.6340@pd7urf3no...
>>I have been researching the Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6 microphones for
>>use with acoustic instruments. So far the samples I have heard from both
>>are very good and as a general statement, to my ear, the C42 is slightly
>>brighter. They are priced close enough that I could purchase either one
>>but the CEMC6 has removable capsules making them a little more versatile.
>>Has anyone used both of these microphones and if so do you have any
>>opinions? Thanks.
>>
>> Bob
> I have not heard them, but from what I know about the construction of the
> CEMC6, which is shared with a number of very inexpensive Chinese brands,
> the Peluso must be far superior.
>
> Bob Morein
> (310) 237-6511
CORRECTION: The Josephson must be far superior.
Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511
Author: Date: Subject:
Bob
2008-06-12 01:09:11
Re: CORRECTION!!!
Is the workmanship really that bad? The only chinese mic I have is a SP C1
and it's not too bad. Mind you it's never been on the road!
"Soundhaspriority" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:4NKdnU21mIZpcdPVnZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Soundhaspriority" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:epWdnfGAAsDLetPVnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:cFB3k.20505$C12.6340@pd7urf3no...
>>>I have been researching the Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6 microphones
>>>for use with acoustic instruments. So far the samples I have heard from
>>>both are very good and as a general statement, to my ear, the C42 is
>>>slightly brighter. They are priced close enough that I could purchase
>>>either one but the CEMC6 has removable capsules making them a little more
>>>versatile. Has anyone used both of these microphones and if so do you
>>>have any opinions? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Bob
>> I have not heard them, but from what I know about the construction of the
>> CEMC6, which is shared with a number of very inexpensive Chinese brands,
>> the Peluso must be far superior.
>>
>> Bob Morein
>> (310) 237-6511
> CORRECTION: The Josephson must be far superior.
>
> Bob Morein
> (310) 237-6511
>
Author: Date: Subject:
Jim Weld
2008-06-12 23:22:37
Re: CORRECTION!!!
I don't understand the bad-mouthing of the Peluso. I have a
pair, and I think they are quite good. Great on piano. The
construction is nothing to brag about, but the capsule is where
it's at, and the Pelusos seem to have their quality put there.
The capsule can come off without worry, but I wouldn't do it
every day. But then again, I had lots of problems with AKG 451s
and their bad threads. Bob seems to hate the wire mesh in the
body of the mic, but it could be replaced if it caused you any
problems. To me, it sounds way better than the old 451 anytime.
I can't compare it to another Chinese mic although I thought it
was much better than the Octava sdc. Not as mellow as the
Schoeps.
Jim Weld
"Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:XG_3k.25124$gc5.13270@pd7urf2no...
> Is the workmanship really that bad? The only chinese mic I have
is a SP C1
> and it's not too bad. Mind you it's never been on the road!
>
>
> "Soundhaspriority" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:4NKdnU21mIZpcdPVnZ2dnUVZ_oSunZ2d@giganews.com...
> >
> > "Soundhaspriority" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:epWdnfGAAsDLetPVnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@giganews.com...
> >>
> >> "Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:cFB3k.20505$C12.6340@pd7urf3no...
> >>>I have been researching the Josephson C42 and Peluso CEMC6
microphones
> >>>for use with acoustic instruments. So far the samples I have
heard from
> >>>both are very good and as a general statement, to my ear,
the C42 is
> >>>slightly brighter. They are priced close enough that I could
purchase
> >>>either one but the CEMC6 has removable capsules making them
a little more
> >>>versatile. Has anyone used both of these microphones and if
so do you
> >>>have any opinions? Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Bob
> >> I have not heard them, but from what I know about the
construction of the
> >> CEMC6, which is shared with a number of very inexpensive
Chinese brands,
> >> the Peluso must be far superior.
> >>
> >> Bob Morein
> >> (310) 237-6511
> > CORRECTION: The Josephson must be far superior.
> >
> > Bob Morein
> > (310) 237-6511
> >
>
>
|