Author: Date: Subject:
Industrial One
2008-07-16 13:38:05
The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
duration of 10 - 50 seconds. They'll be encoded with different codecs
at various bitrates, decoded to raw waveform and packed in a RAR
archive with a copy of the original, uncompressed samples. Get it
here: http://sharebee.com/d695aaed
Once you acquire the wavs, you will see every original song with a
name and its derivatives will have a number appended. You will compare
each to the original and write down how you perceive the quality, in
the following scale:
5 - Derivative sounds exactly like the original. No noticeable
artifacts.
4 - Minor artifacts and audible defects. Good quality overall.
3 - Considerable defects. Sounds somewhat flawed compared to original.
2 - Low quality. Audio artifacts very prominent.
1 - Extremely shitty quality, sounds like the song is playing from the
bottom of a garbage can.
Less than 1 - Barely recognizable or not recognizable at all.
You may use half-points like 4.5, 3.5 if you feel your perception is
in-between some of 'em, like if you don't hear flaws but the audio
"feels" different in a way you can't explain you can give it a 4.9,
4.8 etc. and optionally, you can follow your rating with an
explanation of what you noticed. When you're done, e-mail me the text
file, i repeat, EMAIL, don't post it here. The results will be posted
publicly when the test's done.
Use good quality headphones, but if you believe your high-end speakers
do the job the same if not better, go ahead. Don't use any software/
hardware tweaks/mixers that interpolate, reverb or alter the original
signal in any way.
Don't participate if you're on hearing aid, are old as fuck and have
crappy ears, an autistic twat, not human (I don't work with dogs yo)
or believe you have any significant problems hearing. Also, don't do
it while you're tweaked off your ass, woke up from a hangover, sleep-
deprived or simply distracted by the horn of the train. We want a
neurotypical point of view here. Oh and, don't do the whole test in
one sitting. You may become too accustomed to the type of music and
develop those weird resonances, placebo effects etc. Do a couple
dozen, then continue later, or on another day. DO IT WHEN YOU REALLY
FEEL LIKE DOING IT, not when you've got 10 spare minutes before you
gotta take your antidepressants.
And lastly, don't try to bullshit me by lying or cheating on the test,
'cuz I'll know. You are not to do ANYTHING with the .wavs except open
them with your media player and listen. No analyzing with an audio
engineering app to determine the level of compression (if that's even
possible) -- but I doubt any of you got no life that you get kicks
outta spending hours trying to deceive some anonymous named
"Industrial One" on the internet.
Thanks.
Author: Date: Subject:
Tobiah
2008-07-17 09:23:29
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
> The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
> music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
> melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
> duration of 10 - 50 seconds.
Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Author: Date: Subject:
Industrial One
2008-07-17 14:57:27
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
On Jul 17, 10:23 am, Tobiah <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
> > The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
> > music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
> > melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
> > duration of 10 - 50 seconds.
>
> Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?
>
> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
I'm a Trance/Industrial Rave freak. The test audio subjects do not
qualify, as Trance didn't exist at the time most of them were produced
(1986-1992), nor do I listen to them individually. This test is to
determine the most ideal lossy codec/bitrate for such music. Join in
if you want, no registration is required.
Author: Date: Subject:
Mr.T
2008-07-18 15:39:22
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
"Tobiah" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.07.17.16.23.21.892490@tobiah.org...
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
> > The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
> > music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
> > melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
> > duration of 10 - 50 seconds.
>
> Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?
Because he doesn't know any better it seems.
Or is interested in proving what the rest of us knew 30 years ago.
MrT.
Author: Date: Subject:
Industrial One
2008-07-17 23:34:14
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
On Jul 17, 11:39 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
> "Tobiah" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2008.07.17.16.23.21.892490@tobiah.org...
>
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:38:05 -0700, Industrial One wrote:
> > > The samples have been compiled. They will be a very specific type of
> > > music, early 8-bit mono tracks utilizing square/sawtooth waves for
> > > melody, triangle for bass and white noise for percussion, with a
> > > duration of 10 - 50 seconds.
>
> > Why are you interested in anything 8-bit?
>
> Because he doesn't know any better it seems.
> Or is interested in proving what the rest of us knew 30 years ago.
>
> MrT.
You trying to take the piss? Download the fucking RAR and it'll clear
your confusion.
Author: Date: Subject:
David Morgan (MAMS)
2008-07-18 06:41:10
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
"Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message...
> Download the fucking RAR and it'll clear your confusion.
RAR's don't fuck, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit audio...
and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.
Author: Date: Subject:
Industrial One
2008-07-18 05:43:06
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
On Jul 18, 12:41 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
wrote:
> "Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message...
> > Download the fucking RAR and it'll clear your confusion.
>
> RAR's don't fuck, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit audio...
> and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.
All right wise ass, if a 2-digit number means so much to you, I can
rip a seperate group to 16-bit in one click. The archive will only be
about 250 megs.
Author: Date: Subject:
David Morgan (MAMS)
2008-07-18 15:12:29
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
"Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message...
> "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm> wrote:
> > "Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message...
> > > Download the fucking RAR and it'll clear your confusion.
> > RAR's don't fuck, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit audio...
> > and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.
> I can rip a seperate group to 16-bit in one click.
Just don't 'rip' this group.
--
David Morgan (MAMS)
Morgan Audio Media Service
http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com
Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901
_____________________________
http://www.januarysound.com
Author: Date: Subject:
Mr.T
2008-07-19 14:17:24
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
"Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:70076e73-cf68-4b6c-9030-dc8718ea05d4@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 18, 12:41 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
> wrote:
> > "Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message...
> > > Download the fucking RAR and it'll clear your confusion.
> >
> > RAR's don't fuck, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit
audio...
> > and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.
>
> All right wise ass, if a 2-digit number means so much to you, I can
> rip a seperate group to 16-bit in one click. The archive will only be
> about 250 megs.
Given that you have already proven to all here that you don't have the
slightest clue, why would anyone want to waste their time and money?
I would suggest that most people here have already done their own tests, or
can easily do so without your files.
MrT.
Author: Date: Subject:
Industrial One
2008-07-19 08:40:17
Re: The official double-blind 8-bit listening test
On Jul 18, 10:17 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
> "Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:70076e73-cf68-4b6c-9030-dc8718ea05d4@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jul 18, 12:41 am, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
> > wrote:
> > > "Industrial One" <[email protected]> wrote in message...
> > > > Download the fucking RAR and it'll clear your confusion.
>
> > > RAR's don't fuck, but they certainly do suck.... kinda' like 8 bit
> audio...
> > > and there's no "confusion" about any of those facts.
>
> > All right wise ass, if a 2-digit number means so much to you, I can
> > rip a seperate group to 16-bit in one click. The archive will only be
> > about 250 megs.
>
> Given that you have already proven to all here that you don't have the
> slightest clue, why would anyone want to waste their time and money?
> I would suggest that most people here have already done their own tests, or
> can easily do so without your files.
>
> MrT.
'Thought your previous post was your last. Make it the last this time,
troll. I don't want shitstains in my thread.
|