Author:
Date:
Subject:
cuhulin@webtv.net
2008-04-19 20:49:37
Rigged traffic cameras?
www.leftlanenews.com/six-us-cities-tamper-with-traffic-cameras-for-profic.html
cuhulin
Author:
Date:
Subject:
HLS
2008-04-19 21:06:33
Re: Rigged traffic cameras?
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:26320-480AA131-40@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net...
> www.leftlanenews.com/six-us-cities-tamper-with-traffic-cameras-for-profic.html
> cuhulin
Your link doesnt work for me..
Author:
Date:
Subject:
Pete C.
2008-04-19 21:20:35
Re: Rigged traffic cameras?
HLS wrote:
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:26320-480AA131-40@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net...
> > www.leftlanenews.com/six-us-cities-tamper-with-traffic-cameras-for-profic.html
> > cuhulin
>
> Your link doesnt work for me..
I suspect it's supposed to end in profit.html
Author:
Date:
Subject:
cuhulin@webtv.net
2008-04-19 22:17:23
Re: Rigged traffic cameras?
I guess my keyboard made a typo.But even so, both ways (profic or
profit) works for me.
cuhulin
Author:
Date:
Subject:
Rodan
2008-04-20 04:04:49
Re: Rigged traffic cameras?
Author:
Date:
Subject:
ratatouillerat@yahoo.com
2008-04-20 20:32:47
Re: Rigged traffic cameras?
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:04:49 GMT, "Rodan" <[email protected]> wrote:
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>www.leftlanenews.com/six-us-cities-tamper-with-traffic-cameras-for-profic.html
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>"HLS" wrote:
>
>Your link doesnt work for me..
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>Try this one:
>
>http://www.leftlanenews.com/six-us-cities-tamper-with-traffic-cameras-for-profit.html
>
>Rodan.
>
>
Second version works for me.
Pete
Author:
Date:
Subject:
ratatouillerat@yahoo.com
2008-04-20 21:50:26
Re: Rigged traffic cameras?
|
